|
REPORTING CORRUPTION
A GUIDE FOR PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE DISCOVERY OR REPORTING OF
SUSPECTED PRACTICES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Most people in Malawi want to see an end to
Corruption and
are prepared to make a stand against Corrupt practices. This is good,
because it will make our country stronger and everyone will benefit.
The purpose of this booklet is therefore:
(i) To provide a source of advice to persons who discover
Corruption and want to report Corrupt practices and how they should go
about it
(ii) To encourage employees to look out for
Corrupt practices
in their work places.
(iii) To provide necessary protection against reprisals.
1.2 If people know what to do if they discover corruption at
work, then:
(i) More Corrupt practices in the work place will be unveiled
and people will be willing to give evidence or information.
(ii) There will be a reduction of
Corrupt practices in work
places.
(iii) The work of the Anti Corruption Bureau will be enhanced
and the ACB will be more effective.
2.0 WHY “BLOW THE WHISTLE”?
2.1 Employees, who believe that they have information
(including documents) that may be connected to the planning or
execution of a crime, especially corrupt practices or fraud, have a
duty to draw this fact to the attention of the ACB. This applies
irrespective of whether the information appears to be helpful to the
suspect or defendant. This principle flows from the overriding
requirement that the ACB must have as much evidence as possible during
an investigation so that a correct decision can be made as to whether
or not the suspect should face prosecution. Sometimes, people who do
give information are called “Whistle-blowers”.
2.2 The information contained in this booklet will help to
guide you on the procedures you should follow when providing such
information as well as your responsibilities if you are asked to
respond to a formal request for information from the ACB. The booklet
also explains your legal responsibilities when giving evidence as a
witness and also shows how you can be protected against reprisals in
your workplace that may result from your giving information and
evidence. We hope that when you read this booklet you will be as
helpful and open as you reasonably can.
3.0 FUNCTIONS OF THE ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU
3.1 The functions of the ACB are to:-
(i) To ENFORCE the law on corruption by receiving,
investigating and prosecuting cases of alleged or suspected corrupt
practices.
(ii) To PREVENT corruption by examining the practices
and procedures in public and private bodies in order to secure
revision of procedures and practices that are prone or conducive to
corrupt practices and to advise Public and Private Bodies on ways and
means of preventing corrupt practices and to disseminate information
on the evils of corrupt practices and enlist public support against
corrupt practices.
4.0 What things should you report to the ACB?
You should give any information that may disclose or reveal the
following:
(i) Corrupt Practices
(ii) Fraud and fraudulent accounting
(iii) Abuse or misuse of Public Office
(iv) Public Officers using their influence in the award of
Public Contracts
(v) Public Officers failing to declare their interest in the
award of Public Contracts.
5.0 What must you do if you become aware of such criminal
activities?
(i) Inform the ACB promptly giving as much
information as possible. You may do this by reporting in
person; or by writing to the ACB disclosing
your name or by remaining anonymous; or by telephone, fax or
email
(ii) Make sure that you are acting in good faith.
(iii) Ensure that the information is substantially true.
6.0 You must not:
(i) Act maliciously or deliberately make any false allegation
(ii) Seek any personal gain
(iii) Approach anyone you suspect may be involved in the
commission or planning of corrupt practices.
(iv) Do anything that might put you or others at risk, or
prejudice a possible investigation or prosecution.
(v) Reveal your suspicion to anyone, other than the ACB.
7.0
When are you likely to discover such activities?
The most likely situation in which you might find yourself in
possession of information which may be relevant to a corrupt
practices, investigation or prosecution is where you, or your
department or institution has had official dealings with an individual
or company known to be under investigation. All such dealings will be
relevant, but it is important not to take too narrow a view about
this. The Bureau will usually be able to advise quite readily whether
your information is likely to be of interest to them and would prefer
to be given the opportunity of doing so. Information which throws
light on the background or context of suspected offences may also be
of interest and should be brought to the Bureau’s att1ention.
8.0 REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION: THE IMPORTANCE
OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
8.1 It is essential that the ACB has access to as much
relevant information as possible. Documentary evidence, particularly
where the documents are contemporaneous to the events in question, may
be crucial. Your response to requests for documents should be both
thorough and careful.
8.2 Procedures for Handling Requests
The ACB has the legal power under the Corrupt Practices Act to make
requests for documents and other information from any person.
Normally, such requests are made in the form of a “NOTICE TO
PROVIDE INFORMATION” to the Head of the Department or Institution
who is under a legal obligation to respond quickly. If you think that
you are not the right person to respond, or that others may also have
documents related to the request you should inform the Bureau
promptly.
8.3 Your Responsibility
It is your responsibility to ensure that you fully understand the
terms of any notice or request before responding. If you do not fully
understand the notice or request or if you think you will have
difficulties in complying with it, you should contact the Bureau
immediately. The ACB will then make any necessary clarifications. If
from your knowledge of the work of your department you know the
material sought is not available in the particular form requested but
could be accessed in a different way you should tell this to the
Bureau. However, you will remain under an obligation to volunteer any
information you have or which subsequently comes to light, which you
believe to be relevant.
It is an offence under the Corrupt Practices Act to refuse to comply
with a legal Notice or request, or to hinder or delay the work of the
ACB.
8.4 Declining What Documents are Relevant
In deciding what documents may be relevant; you should be guided by
the terms of the Notice or request. You should not confine your
attention to documents which support any particular version of events
even if this is what the request asks you to do: a document which
suggests that a given event did not happen is clearly as relevant as
one suggesting that it did. Usually the notice or request will give
brief details of the offence being investigated and what information
is needed. If you are aware of any information or documents which
may be relevant to the offence or to any known lines of defence or if
such information or documents subsequently come to light, this should
be reported to the ACB. You should also bear in mind the possibility
that relevant information may exist in non-written form e.g. in a
computer database.
8.5 Locating Documents or Other Information
Where possible, you should as a first step discuss the request for
documents with any colleagues who were directly involved in the matter
to which it relates. Even if they only have a hazy recollection of
these matters, they may be able to help you narrow down the range of
files which may contain relevant material or alert you to search in
files which might otherwise have been overlooked. You must search for
any document which you know, believe or expect to exist and if any of
these cannot be found you must inform the ACB. why you believe or
would expect these documents to exist and what you know about their
contents. You must also examine those files which by their title or
your knowledge of their content, you would expect to be the ones to
contain any relevant material. Loose documents should be located and
checked. In addition, individual colleagues likely to have been in
receipt of documents within the search parameters should be asked
whether they have unregistered loose documents, cupboards, filling
cabinets and drawers in which loose documents might be stored should
also be checked.
8.6 Responding to Request
The Notice or request for documents may suggest or prescribe the form
that your response should take, and it may be convenient for you to
respond in this way. Possible forms of response include:-
(a) Sending copies of all the documents that you have
identified as relevant to the request or to the matters under
investigation
(b) Inviting the Bureau to examine the documents you have
identified
(c) Describing any information and/or documents you have
identified so that the ACB can assess whether or not it is likely to
be relevant.
9.0 GIVING EVIDENCE - INTERVIEWS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS
9.1 If you have been personally involved in events or
procedures connected to a criminal investigation, you may be asked to
give a personal account of the events or procedures in an interview by
the ACB and make a Witness Statement. You may later have to give
evidence in Court.
The ACB will give you advice on the legal requirements (and
constraints) you must comply with in giving evidence. However, there
are two overriding considerations that you should bear in mind:
(a) That it is YOUR evidence, not that of your
institution, the investigators, the prosecution team or anyone else;
and
(b) That you must be truthful and not mislead by omission.
9.2 Witness Summons
If you are served with a witness summons you will be placed under a
legal obligation to appear before a court of law. You should obtain
advice from the ACB as soon as you are served with a summons. Your
upkeep will be taken care of by the ACB.
9.3 Giving Your Own Evidence
Usually, an ACB Investigation Officer will interview you if you are a
witness and then write a statement based upon the answers you give.
This is a convenient method of assembling and structuring the evidence
and of ensuring that everything is covered. However, you are entirely
free to have any amendments made to your statement and you may write
it yourself. You will be required to make a declaration to the effect
that what you have to say is the truth and that if you tell lies you
may be prosecuted yourself.
However, the important point to always remember is that whether the
Investigation Officer records your statement, or you write it
yourself, at the end of the day it will be your statement. Therefore
before you sign the statement you must make sure and are absolutely
satisfied that the contents are true to the best of your knowledge and
belief.
You must take care when answering an interviewer’s question and in
checking the completeness and accuracy of any statement produced from
them. Usually the interview will try to ask mainly “open” questions -
ones that allow you to answer how you think best. However, some at
least are likely to be closed questions - ones which limit the range
of possible answers often either as “Yes” or a “no”. This is fine
where an unqualified “Yes” or ”no” tells the whole story, but if you
feel that you need to qualify your answer in any way (e.g. Yes but”
“no except” or sometimes”) then you should get the interviewer to ask
you an open question instead, or otherwise make it clear that an
unqualified answer will necessarily be incomplete or even misleading.
9.4 Testing the Accuracy and Reliability of Your Statement
When checking your statement you should actively test its accuracy and
reliability rather just responding to those passages which immediately
strike you as wrong:-
(a) Are the particular incidents covered y the statement
placed in their proper context? E.g. If the statement says that the
suspects told you something, did they write, telephone or meet you
specifically to pass on this information, or was just mentioned in
passing whilst some other matter was being discussed?
(b) How sure are you of the matters covered in your
statement? Are any uncertainties clearly indicated? Has your
recollection of events been influenced by what other people told you
at the time or by what you have learnt subsequently? Or
(d) If the suspects have offered explanations
of this behaviour, then, leaving aside the question of whether these
explanations are true or not are they credible? Think about the
reasons for your answer to this question. Are these reflected in the
statement?
9.5 Giving a Balanced Account
It is also important, that you ensure that the statement taken as a
whole gives a properly balanced account and tells the whole story so
far as it is known to you. In any extreme cases is it possible for
every answer you give to be true when taken in isolation. But the
statement produced from your answers must not be misleading or even
false when viewed in totality. Sometimes, a statement may appear to
be misleading because parts of the story are missing or because too
much (or too little) emphasis is placed on a particular issue. After
checking that each individual answer or topic is accurate, you should
consider the impact of the statement as a whole.
?
Does it provide a true and fair account overall?
?
If some parts of the statement are damaging or critical of the suspect
and other parts are helpful or supportive, is the balance between
these parts right?
9.6 When Your Statement cannot tell the Whole Story
There may be some occasions where you are unable to tell the whole
story in your statement. This may happen where:-
?
You cannot remember what happened; or
?
You are unable to distinguish between what you remember and what you
have learnt since.
Whilst your statement should always be as complete as possible, the
emphasis must be on accuracy and reliability. However, it is
essential that any gaps or deficiencies in the Statement are clearly
indicated as failure to do so will in itself make the statement
inaccurate or unreliable or both.
9.7 Relevance
It is the responsibility of the ACB to determine the relevance of any
material revealed through the investigative process and it is
inappropriate for others to make representations on this issue or
otherwise to seek to influence the decision of the ACB. All
employees have a general professional duty to reveal to the ACB the
existence of any information (including documents) that they believe
may be connected with the case under investigation and to supply the
ACB with copies of any documents that the ACB determines to be
relevant.
10 PROTECTION
6.1 The ACB will ensure that disclosure of information in
good faith is protected. If you have provided information to the ACB,
your identity shall remain confidential to the extent allowed by law,
unless you waive that right in writing.
6.2 Retaliation against employees acting in good faith by
making an unwarranted adverse change to their employment, status,
terms and conditions is prohibited.
6.3 Retaliation includes, but is not limited to
(a) Frequent and undesirable changes in work assigned
(b) Refusal to assign meaningful work
(c) Unsubstantiated reprimand or unsatisfactory performance
(d) Demotions
(e) Pay reductions
(f) Unjust denial of promotion
(g) Transfer or re-assignment and
(h) Suspension or dismissal
11 Discovery of Information after a Prosecution has been Concluded
Where new information comes to light after a prosecution has been
completed, you must notify the ACB Commission at once. This
information may be required for a fresh investigation.
SUPPORT THE WORK OF THE ACB AND HELP MALAWI TO BECOME A CORRUPT-FREE
ZONE
REJECT-RESIST-REPORT CORRUPTION
THE ANTI-CORRUPTION
BUREAU
P.O. BOX 2437
LILONGWE
OR
Private Bag 170
Blantyre
Tel: 01624229/350
Fax: 01622572
e-mail:
acbbt@sdnp.org.mw
OR
P.O BOX 230
Mzuzu
Tel/Fax: 01331770
e-mail:
acbmzuzu@sdnp.org.mw
URL: http://www.sdnp.org.mw/ruleoflaw/acb
|